The Sakinorva Databank
home index activity
random rules donate

Agnosticism

Religious Philosophy

in Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

Agnosticism ~ Sakinorva Databank

Agnosticism


Religious Philosophy

ei
ns
ft
pj
functionenneavariantsociopsyche
INTP 4
5w4 2
5wb 2
sp/sx 3
LII 2
ILI 1
FLEV 1
234 567 891
h
e
x
a
c
o

total votes 20

5

4

4

3

1

3

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold**bold**
italic*italic*
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}
You may not modify this entry's picture.

Taco110

Ni-Se

you'll see

ST

2021/02/25 (Thu) 22:08:26

#8653

Really the only logical and intellectually honest position you can take on the issue of religion. It's not a matter of playing both sides so much as it is a matter of there's no proof for a God nor is there any way to disprove God. In order to make claims, you must provide evidence and/or sound, cogent reasoning. Instead, it's a matter of likelihood. God likely doesn't exist because there isn't any proof and the reasoning presented by theists is circular and retarded beyond belief (using the Bible as evidence of itself - yeah, not gonna work lmao that shit contradicts itself so many times.

Editing post #8653 by Taco110

Replying to post #8653 by Taco110

dateusernamevote
19/05/19 02:26INTJ-2698 INTP
19/05/12 00:32tch INTP
19/05/07 23:29LadyX INTP
20/12/24 20:14Tman INTP
19/05/06 12:22Taco110 INTP
dateusernamevote
20/05/01 21:57tch INTP
19/05/19 02:26INTJ-2698 INTP
20/06/18 13:37Tman INTP
19/05/06 12:22Taco110 INTP
dateusernamevote
19/12/14 16:12Tman 5wb
19/05/19 02:26INTJ-2698 5wb
19/05/07 23:29LadyX 5w4
19/05/06 12:22Taco110 5w4
dateusernamevote
19/05/07 23:29LadyX sp/sx
20/06/18 13:37Tman sp/sx
19/05/06 12:22Taco110 sp/sx
dateusernamevote
20/11/16 16:26Tman 594
dateusernamevote
24/10/25 16:03tman ILI
19/05/19 02:26INTJ-2698 LII
19/05/06 12:22Taco110 LII
dateusernamevote
20/12/24 20:13Tman FLEV