Phsc ~ Sakinorva Databank

Phsc

Sakinorva Databank

Users

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

INTP 8

INTJ 8

ISTJ 2

ENTJ 1

5w6 15

cp6w5 5

6w5 2

3w4 1

cp6w7 1

1w9 1

cp5w6 1

sp/so 10

so/sp 6

sx/so 1

LII 14

SLI 2

IEE 1

SLE 1

ILI 1

LSI 1

LVFE 7

LFVE 1

total votes 124

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	phsc 2024/01/14 (Sun) 04:45:29 #8925
	I woke up out of schelude and decided to look a bit more into typology again, I might still do some of the other tests of this website to see how my personality changed by test results but mostly out of curiosity (I only took the shorter tests), but I find it very interesting how much bullshit there is on most theories, and I decided to type some of the people I've fucked/been with constantly to the point I knew them well and all, not in a particular order: ISFP SEI 9w1 926 EFLV ESFP ESE 2w3 269 EFLV ESTP SLE 8w7 864 FLVE maybe cp6w7 or whatever ESFP SEI 6w7 693FELV ESFP SEE 7w8 784 VFLE INFJ EIE 9w1 962 ELFV ISFJ EII 9w1 962 ELVF ISFJ SEI 9w1 926 ELFV It is interesting because I think the real pattern is that most of these people were just very horny and found me hot, probably ignoring some red flags as the fact I don't have a single picture on any dating app smiling, look like a school shooter or the type of person who murders people in general, in general I think these days I look very unfriendly and scary, but I do look rather masculine and a lot of these people had BDSM kinks where obviously they were the submissive bottom, I don't personally enjoy it but I sort of get the appeal. As you can probably guess most did not last that long, fundamentally I don't want a relationship and I don't actually bond with people, a relationship is too clingy and people are way too much of a time investment for me, to be honest this is what I fucked up the most about my self typology last time, I am still super introverted, I just have no issues talking or speaking with people at all, I never really did but now it is something I do in a rather comfortable motion, but it does tire me out and it is not something I particularly enjoy. Interesting enough the ESE and EIE girls are the ones I was most compatible with, ESE being a bit too clingy and the EIE in general being the best but not as good looking as some of the others, the SLE was probably the hottest as well as the two SEIs, but conversations were just way too fucking boring and like they were way too boring as people to be honest. So to sort of update what I self type as these days, I think I am InTJ, N is sort of too schizophrenic and magical thinking for me to relate more to. Also I fucked up really hard with that exercise routine, it was absurdly overtraining, I switched it up to something similar but that only lasts 110 minutes instead of the almost 2 hour n a half that the last was sometimes, doing a lot of supersets now. A: chest triceps delts, B: back biceps forearm, C: legs, basically that but I am probably still overtraining, generally ABC rest ABC rest etc, I might do a way more complicated split where I do 2 groups a day (the issue is legs tbh) and then rest, or just lower the total volume but do it all more intense ala Dorian Yates. I also started taking beta-alanine as it is the only supplement other than creatine that actually works, also when unmotivated I take caffeine to help with my training but I generally make coffee, I mean 1 3 7 trimethylxanthine because that sounds cooler. I also stopped taking ZMA because it does not work but instead I am taking multivitamin pills to complement my diet, which I don't think I got into detail but it is mostly high carbs at breakfast/brunch (generally rice cream or oatmeal), high protein and some carbs at lunch (generally any type of meat with rice and sometimes some vegetables), high carbs high fat for supper (generally white bread, a lot of it) and high carbs high fat and high protein for dinner (generally pasta with fatty fish or red meat, sometimes pork and chicken). Anyway, thinking about enneagram as the core motivations, I sort of don't relate to anything, my current life goal is to survive, that is literally it, I don't want to have to worry about these things so I try to be most efficient as possible with them, but I still like being intellectually competent at things and for example, diet and working out I get lost in the more theoretical aspect (which is very solid, there is a lot of research, electromyography, etc) and being most efficient with it, it is also one of the things I enjoy the most because the objective is to fail, you want to go in, achieve muscle failure and that is it, there is nothing that can go wrong other than the fact the gym is used my multiple people and I hate tiktok teenagers, also I am taking a more powerbuilding approach, lower reps higher loads, but not focusing that much on aesthetics but instead practical physical strength and health. But yeah, more introverted, probably sp/sx and probably 5 something, 583??? 513??? probably the first these days, but like 8w9? or is this just 5 going to 8? no fucking idea, but it really does not matter, typology is dogshit anyway, might take the Rowe Enneagram test and the new cognitive functions domain test or whatever this website has to offer.

Editing post #8925 by phsc I woke up out of schelude and decided to look a bit more into typology again, I might still do some of the other tests of this website to see how my personality changed by test results but mostly out of curiosity (I only took the shorter tests), but I find it very interesting how much bullshit there is on most theories, and I decided to type some of the people I've fucked/been with constantly to the point I knew them well and all, not in a particular order:<br>ISFP SEI 9w1 926 EFLV<br>ESFP ESE 2w3 269 EFLV<br>ESTP SLE 8w7 864 FLVE maybe cp6w7 or whatever<br>ESFP SEI 6w7 693FELV<br>ESFP SEE 7w8 784 VFLE<br>INFJ EIE 9w1 962 ELFV<br>ISFJ EII 9w1 962 ELVF<br>ISFJ SEI 9w1 926 ELFV<br><br>It is interesting because I think the real pattern is that most of these people were just very horny and found me hot, probably ignoring some red flags as the fact I don't have a single picture on any dating app smiling, look like a school shooter or the type of person who murders people in general, in general I think these days I look very unfriendly and scary, but I do look rather masculine and a lot of these people had BDSM kinks where obviously they were the submissive bottom, I don't personally enjoy it but I sort of get the appeal. <br>As you can probably guess most did not last that long, fundamentally I don't want a relationship and I don't actually bond with people, a relationship is too clingy and people are way too much of a time investment for me, to be honest this is what I fucked up the most about my self typology last time, I am still super introverted, I just have no issues talking or speaking with people at all, I never really did but now it is something I do in a rather comfortable motion, but it does tire me out and it is not something I particularly enjoy.<br>Interesting enough the ESE and EIE girls are the ones I was most compatible with, ESE being a bit too clingy and the EIE in general being the best but not as good looking as some of the others, the SLE was probably the hottest as well as the two SEIs, but conversations were just way too fucking boring and like they were way too boring as people to be honest.<br><br>So to sort of update what I self type as these days, I think I am InTJ, N is sort of too schizophrenic and magical thinking for me to relate more to.<br><br>Also I fucked up really hard with that exercise routine, it was absurdly overtraining, I switched it up to something similar but that only lasts 110 minutes instead of the almost 2 hour n a half that the last was sometimes, doing a lot of supersets now.<br>A: chest triceps delts, B: back biceps forearm, C: legs, basically that but I am probably still overtraining, generally ABC rest ABC rest etc, I might do a way more complicated split where I do 2 groups a day (the issue is legs tbh) and then rest, or just lower the total volume but do it all more intense ala Dorian Yates.<br><br>I also started taking beta-alanine as it is the only supplement other than creatine that actually works, also when unmotivated I take caffeine to help with my training but I generally make coffee, I mean 1 3 7 trimethylxanthine because that sounds cooler. I also stopped taking ZMA because it does not work but instead I am taking multivitamin pills to complement my diet, which I don't think I got into detail but it is mostly high carbs at breakfast/brunch (generally rice cream or oatmeal), high protein and some carbs at lunch (generally any type of meat with rice and sometimes some vegetables), high carbs high fat for supper (generally white bread, a lot of it) and high carbs high fat and high protein for dinner (generally pasta with fatty fish or red meat, sometimes pork and chicken).<br><br>Anyway, thinking about enneagram as the core motivations, I sort of don't relate to anything, my current life goal is to survive, that is literally it, I don't want to have to worry about these things so I try to be most efficient as possible with them, but I still like being intellectually competent at things and for example, diet and working out I get lost in the more theoretical aspect (which is very solid, there is a lot of research, electromyography, etc) and being most efficient with it, it is also one of the things I enjoy the most because the objective is to fail, you want to go in, achieve muscle failure and that is it, there is nothing that can go wrong other than the fact the gym is used my multiple people and I hate tiktok teenagers, also I am taking a more powerbuilding approach, lower reps higher loads, but not focusing that much on aesthetics but instead practical physical strength and health.<br><br>But yeah, more introverted, probably sp/sx and probably 5 something, 583??? 513??? probably the first these days, but like 8w9? or is this just 5 going to 8? no fucking idea, but it really does not matter, typology is dogshit anyway, might take the Rowe Enneagram test and the new cognitive functions domain test or whatever this website has to offer.
Replying to post #8925 by phsc

	phsc 2023/12/19 (Tue) 11:04:55 #8924
	Since my votes won't register properly - probably due to the website being broken or whatever - I think I should make a comment. So for some reason today I decided to do some typology tests and generally think about what I would type myself as these days, I have changed a lot as a person and my "type" generally reflects that, typology is dumb bullshit but I think that is rather clear by now, neuroscience and proper science in general explains human behaviour infinitely better, and things that are measurable and literally define how your brain works are the key, oxytocin, dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine/noradrenaline, not to mention hormones such as testosterone. Anyway, I redid many of the tests I did years ago, I still got INTJ for MBTI basically, but much lower I, lower N, higher T and higher J. For cognitive functions and such of course it depends on authors and such, but I got very little Ne and Ni generally speaking, and infinitely higher Se, Ti and Te are still obviously the higher, and Si is rather low as well, both Fe and Fi are very low, generally I got ISTP results, for socionics I score much higher Se and lower Ne/Ni and to be honest I only score high Se Te and Ti, for enneagram it got very weird, generally speaking I still score high for 5, but infinitely lower for 1, MUCH higher for 8 and a bit lower for 3, altough some tests like the enneagram one of this website did say that thing about 5 going to 8 when shit is going right or whatever so I guess it makes sense? generally speaking sp first but choosing betwen sx and so is still a bit hard, but I think sx takes the cake now. LVFE still remains. About my life, I joined the military, left the military, got into university, got a job, started to workout and take care of myself, I calculate all ingested calories and constantly do blood exams and other things to check for any health issues. I workout every day, doing what I call an abcXabc, where: A: bench press, close grip bench, inclined bench, triceps pulley, dumbbell press, dumbbell shoulder press, peck fly, reverse peck fly, abdominal machine, leg raises on a pullup bar, lying neck flexion and extension and lastly planks. B: pullups and chinups, deadlift, bicep curls with barbell, dumbbell bench rows, reverse curls, reverse flies, hammer curls, wide cable seated rows, bicep curls with dumbbells, external shoulder rotation, internal shoulder rotation, wrist curls, reverse wrist curls and plank. C: squat, lateral raises, leg press, shrugs, standing calf machine, lying leg curl, cable lateral raises, leg extension, sitting leg curl, steated calf, abductor chair, adductor chair and plank. On X it is my rest day, however I do very intense cardio, generally I go to where my current sexual interest lives at (or a close-by motel) - generally running or walking but taking a bus or biking if necessary - and then have sex, which is great cardio after all, I like to see this as a reward mechanism for the very intense cardio and it works, I don't believe in love or actual human connection and instead see sex simply as a biological necessity, a natural addiction we all have, and do not relate to people on an emotional level to the point of wanting a real serious long term relationship, nor do I like them enough, good thing modern dating apps exist and generally work within this narrative. I go to university and then my job before working out, I am still a programmer and I am still studying that, altough in a more corporate way, personally I don't really want more money as I think I own most things I wish I did, altough of course some other more expensive goods, such as a great car and firearms and other self defense tools, are things I aim for. Altough I do need some new clothes (I learned how to sew and adjust clothing to my body, altough I often still pay people to do this) since I am getting physically bigger and some older clothing does not fit properly anymore. I try to maximize my testosterone by eating and behaviour, I don't take many supplements other than creatine, maltodextrine and ZMA, I am currently on SSRIs and mirtazapine, and I feel no fear, anxiety, and I am generally numb to basically everything, I still sometimes consider rejoining the army and graduating as a basically sniper (I was a designated marksman) but I am unsure if I could follow my current routine in a way that is compatible with that, not to mention how calculating calories and such would literally be impossible. I however gave up on the typical lies we are socially fed and might make it my life goal to murder people I severely dislike, altough since lately I don't feels strong feelings (such as anger or frustration) I find it rather unlikely some people who is not directly affecting my life in a negative way will make it to the list, but I want to have the possibility there. I practice tax evasion and want to leave my country, I don't want to get into politics since I hate it but most notably hate politicians and their false promises and lies, I don't care about ideologies or how the world should be, I think it is insanity to want to change the world since most people cannot even change their own lives, and I think it is total insanity to want to change the world instead of adapting to it, altough this sounds like a "P" quote or whatever, I don't think I've ever been as J, with my scheludes and routine and everything planned. I don't think my life has ever been better and I think it will only get better, when I get older, around 40 or 50 I will start TRT. While I am still introverted and generally take the weekends as some days to relax and ponder, I feel no social anxiety or pressure so I can just go up to people and talk to them with no issues, however I still do dislike basically everyone, everyone is inherently selfish as is a logical conclusion of the way humans behave, but I think being aware of this makes relations easier, and most people are very ignorant and very one dimentional, most notably women but not limited to that. I don't like to use the internet or talk to internet people as I believe they are losers and I greatly value my relations as your enviroment greatly shapes your mentality, so I only talk to people with similar interests and competence within my judgement is such. Typology sucks but I am rather bored since I am on a work and university break due to the year ending, and I just wanted to check these things. So my self type as of 19 of december of 2023 is inTJ, ISTP, 5w6 going to 8, 583 or 538 (hard to choose), sp/sx (maybe sp/so), LVFE, LSI.

Editing post #8924 by phsc Since my votes won't register properly - probably due to the website being broken or whatever - I think I should make a comment.<br>So for some reason today I decided to do some typology tests and generally think about what I would type myself as these days, I have changed a lot as a person and my "type" generally reflects that, typology is dumb bullshit but I think that is rather clear by now, neuroscience and proper science in general explains human behaviour infinitely better, and things that are measurable and literally define how your brain works are the key, oxytocin, dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine/noradrenaline, not to mention hormones such as testosterone.<br><br>Anyway, I redid many of the tests I did years ago, I still got INTJ for MBTI basically, but much lower I, lower N, higher T and higher J. For cognitive functions and such of course it depends on authors and such, but I got very little Ne and Ni generally speaking, and infinitely higher Se, Ti and Te are still obviously the higher, and Si is rather low as well, both Fe and Fi are very low, generally I got ISTP results, for socionics I score much higher Se and lower Ne/Ni and to be honest I only score high Se Te and Ti, for enneagram it got very weird, generally speaking I still score high for 5, but infinitely lower for 1, MUCH higher for 8 and a bit lower for 3, altough some tests like the enneagram one of this website did say that thing about 5 going to 8 when shit is going right or whatever so I guess it makes sense? generally speaking sp first but choosing betwen sx and so is still a bit hard, but I think sx takes the cake now. LVFE still remains.<br><br>About my life, I joined the military, left the military, got into university, got a job, started to workout and take care of myself, I calculate all ingested calories and constantly do blood exams and other things to check for any health issues. I workout every day, doing what I call an abcXabc, where:<br>A: bench press, close grip bench, inclined bench, triceps pulley, dumbbell press, dumbbell shoulder press, peck fly, reverse peck fly, abdominal machine, leg raises on a pullup bar, lying neck flexion and extension and lastly planks.<br>B: pullups and chinups, deadlift, bicep curls with barbell, dumbbell bench rows, reverse curls, reverse flies, hammer curls, wide cable seated rows, bicep curls with dumbbells, external shoulder rotation, internal shoulder rotation, wrist curls, reverse wrist curls and plank.<br>C: squat, lateral raises, leg press, shrugs, standing calf machine, lying leg curl, cable lateral raises, leg extension, sitting leg curl, steated calf, abductor chair, adductor chair and plank.<br><br>On X it is my rest day, however I do very intense cardio, generally I go to where my current sexual interest lives at (or a close-by motel) - generally running or walking but taking a bus or biking if necessary - and then have sex, which is great cardio after all, I like to see this as a reward mechanism for the very intense cardio and it works, I don't believe in love or actual human connection and instead see sex simply as a biological necessity, a natural addiction we all have, and do not relate to people on an emotional level to the point of wanting a real serious long term relationship, nor do I like them enough, good thing modern dating apps exist and generally work within this narrative.<br><br>I go to university and then my job before working out, I am still a programmer and I am still studying that, altough in a more corporate way, personally I don't really want more money as I think I own most things I wish I did, altough of course some other more expensive goods, such as a great car and firearms and other self defense tools, are things I aim for. Altough I do need some new clothes (I learned how to sew and adjust clothing to my body, altough I often still pay people to do this) since I am getting physically bigger and some older clothing does not fit properly anymore.<br><br>I try to maximize my testosterone by eating and behaviour, I don't take many supplements other than creatine, maltodextrine and ZMA, I am currently on SSRIs and mirtazapine, and I feel no fear, anxiety, and I am generally numb to basically everything, I still sometimes consider rejoining the army and graduating as a basically sniper (I was a designated marksman) but I am unsure if I could follow my current routine in a way that is compatible with that, not to mention how calculating calories and such would literally be impossible. I however gave up on the typical lies we are socially fed and might make it my life goal to murder people I severely dislike, altough since lately I don't feels strong feelings (such as anger or frustration) I find it rather unlikely some people who is not directly affecting my life in a negative way will make it to the list, but I want to have the possibility there.<br><br>I practice tax evasion and want to leave my country, I don't want to get into politics since I hate it but most notably hate politicians and their false promises and lies, I don't care about ideologies or how the world should be, I think it is insanity to want to change the world since most people cannot even change their own lives, and I think it is total insanity to want to change the world instead of adapting to it, altough this sounds like a "P" quote or whatever, I don't think I've ever been as J, with my scheludes and routine and everything planned.<br><br>I don't think my life has ever been better and I think it will only get better, when I get older, around 40 or 50 I will start TRT. While I am still introverted and generally take the weekends as some days to relax and ponder, I feel no social anxiety or pressure so I can just go up to people and talk to them with no issues, however I still do dislike basically everyone, everyone is inherently selfish as is a logical conclusion of the way humans behave, but I think being aware of this makes relations easier, and most people are very ignorant and very one dimentional, most notably women but not limited to that.<br><br>I don't like to use the internet or talk to internet people as I believe they are losers and I greatly value my relations as your enviroment greatly shapes your mentality, so I only talk to people with similar interests and competence within my judgement is such. Typology sucks but I am rather bored since I am on a work and university break due to the year ending, and I just wanted to check these things.<br><br>So my self type as of 19 of december of 2023 is inTJ, ISTP, 5w6 going to 8, 583 or 538 (hard to choose), sp/sx (maybe sp/so), LVFE, LSI.
Replying to post #8924 by phsc

	Ally entp 3w4 ile 2021/03/26 (Fri) 17:49:25 #8716
	definitely agree that few people would want to self-id as linear. I always really like the IDEA of type theories of cognition styles (like this and the cognitive functions) as opposed to trait inventories, but i feel like they will always end up failing just by virtue of being what they are, at least until we understand the brain far better or can read people's minds... some of the characters the creator used to illustrate each type had me wondering if we even had enough information about them to place them on one or both axes confidently. Anyway thank you for the wayback machine+video links... if the original upload of the video went private that would explain it, i was going through my google myactivity desperately trying to find it like I KNOW IT'S SOMEWHERE WHY ISNT IT SHOWING UP. The reddit is awesome though for all the nonsensical charts like this https://i.redd.it/qzgmw845jwb61.jpg

Editing post #8716 by Ally definitely agree that few people would want to self-id as linear. I always really like the IDEA of type theories of cognition styles (like this and the cognitive functions) as opposed to trait inventories, but i feel like they will always end up failing just by virtue of being what they are, at least until we understand the brain far better or can read people's minds... some of the characters the creator used to illustrate each type had me wondering if we even had enough information about them to place them on one or both axes confidently. Anyway thank you for the wayback machine+video links... if the original upload of the video went private that would explain it, i was going through my google myactivity desperately trying to find it like I KNOW IT'S SOMEWHERE WHY ISNT IT SHOWING UP. The reddit is awesome though for all the nonsensical charts like this https://i.redd.it/qzgmw845jwb61.jpg
Replying to post #8716 by Ally

	ally entp 3w4 ile 2021/03/26 (Fri) 02:38:41 #8714
	phsc do you still have the website on the typology theory that revolved around thinking styles (lateral vs linear was one of the two dichotomies)? had anime chars arranged on the chart for it and random iqs assigned to everyone that sometimes were questionable. I think it was you that posted it in the discord anyway like a year ago, sorry for o/t comment on your page if not

Editing post #8714 by ally phsc do you still have the website on the typology theory that revolved around thinking styles (lateral vs linear was one of the two dichotomies)? had anime chars arranged on the chart for it and random iqs assigned to everyone that sometimes were questionable. I think it was you that posted it in the discord anyway like a year ago, sorry for o/t comment on your page if not
Replying to post #8714 by ally

	Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/10/24 (Thu) 12:27:05 #7310
	Yeah, I changed my mind. Sorry about that, I know that's anoying, but I really do think you have Ni and Se. It's more in the way you go to "whats there" in the song, the text, over a metatextual evaluation of what the author meant. I still say your one of the best examples of a Ti user I've ever seen (I'm not going to repeat myself, we've talked about this before, and I don't want to waste your time.) I'm going to sit with what you've said for a while, but I think your right about how the pigs use (socionics) Fi.

Editing post #7310 by Tman <p>Yeah, I changed my mind. Sorry about that, I know that's anoying, but I really do think you have Ni and Se. It's more in the way you go to "whats there" in the song, the text, over a metatextual evaluation of what the author meant. I still say your one of the best examples of a Ti user I've ever seen (I'm not going to repeat myself, we've talked about this before, and I don't want to waste your time.) I'm going to sit with what you've said for a while, but I think your right about how the pigs use (socionics) Fi. </p>
Replying to post #7310 by Tman

	Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE 2019/10/14 (Mon) 17:44:55 #7229
	Psyche Yoga/Psychosophy is actually somewhat easy to figure out. Do you value will, logic, emotion, or the senses the most, whether in processing information or in everyday life? First position is, of course, the one you value most and the one most prominent in your character. Second is the one your most relaxed with and the one you use most when interacting with others. Third is the "conflict" position, i.e. the one where you'll take a contrarian or contradictary stance on. Fourth is obviously the one you value least, but still plays a role in your character as the antithesis of what you value most. You come across as an LVFE, based on what I know of you: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20140408215506%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.strannik.de%2Flovesyntax%2F24_lwpe.htm

Editing post #7229 by Jacobus <p>Psyche Yoga/Psychosophy is actually somewhat easy to figure out. Do you value will, logic, emotion, or the senses the most, whether in processing information or in everyday life?</p> <p>First position is, of course, the one you value most and the one most prominent in your character. Second is the one your most relaxed with and the one you use most when interacting with others. Third is the "conflict" position, i.e. the one where you'll take a contrarian or contradictary stance on. Fourth is obviously the one you value least, but still plays a role in your character as the antithesis of what you value most.</p> <p>You come across as an LVFE, based on what I know of you:</p> <p><a href="https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20140408215506%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.strannik.de%2Flovesyntax%2F24_lwpe.htm">https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20140408215506%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.strannik.de%2Flovesyntax%2F24_lwpe.htm</a></p>
Replying to post #7229 by Jacobus

Teru Mikami 2019/08/31 (Sat) 05:55:19 #7033
The LII is easily annoyed by sensory over-stimulation, including loud noises, bright light, and temperature. On the other hand, he easily becomes "addicted" to more pleasurable things, such as music, which have a corresponding effect on his mood (Fe). When left to his own devices, the LII tends to oscillate unhealthily between total indulgence of the senses and total neglect (the latter especially when working on something he feels to be extremely important). He tends to feel guilty for indulging in hedonism for the sake of hedonism. The LII can easily understand whether something is impractical or not, but prefers to explain why using structural principles. He dislikes rote memorization of dates and the like, but paradoxically will often have a mental store of many arcane pieces of information (such as the first 100 digits of pi) he finds interesting or equally absurd technical skills (like mastering a video game). Such skills and information will either be a part of his leisure activities, or relate directly to his main interests, which he chooses not based on their immediate practical consequence, but on how interesting they are.

Editing post #7033 by Teru Mikami <p>The LII is easily annoyed by sensory over-stimulation, including loud noises, bright light, and temperature. <strong>On the other hand, he easily becomes "addicted" to more pleasurable things</strong>, such as music, which have a corresponding effect on his mood (Fe). When left to his own devices, the LII tends to oscillate unhealthily between total indulgence of the senses and total neglect (the latter especially when working on something he feels to be extremely important). He tends to feel guilty for indulging in hedonism for the sake of hedonism.</p> <p>The LII can easily understand whether something is impractical or not, but prefers to explain why using structural principles. He dislikes rote memorization of dates and the like, but paradoxically will often have a mental store of many arcane pieces of information (such as the first 100 digits of pi) <strong>he finds interesting or equally absurd technical skills (like mastering a video game). </strong></p> <p><img alt="" src="https://i.imgur.com/GMJxJew.png" /></p> <p><strong>Such skills and information will either be a part of his leisure activities</strong>, or relate directly to his main interests, which he chooses not based on their immediate practical consequence, but on how interesting they are.</p>
Replying to post #7033 by Teru Mikami

	jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg 2019/08/04 (Sun) 06:49:35 #6887
	were you in mbtibase? I first joined this image based mbti commuity in the last month of perseonality databank or mbti-databank or last 2 months... it was sure a wreck. Bonita, hisoka, hairspray, meldou, etc. Remember the words "I love you" To explain the law of attraction I'd need a smilar concept. I realize "birds of a feather flock together" is vague and overused so instead ask a question... hmmm. phsc is prbably someone who doesn't like the idea of a private message feature in a website like this. I dunno if you have an account in personality cafe. I recommend you make one .

Editing post #6887 by jt <p>were you in mbtibase? I first joined this image based mbti commuity in the last month of perseonality databank or mbti-databank or last 2 months... it was sure a wreck. Bonita, hisoka, hairspray, meldou, etc.</p> <p> </p> </br>Remember the words "I love you" <br> </br> <p>To explain the law of attraction I'd need a smilar concept. I realize "birds of a feather flock together" is vague and overused so instead ask a question... hmmm. phsc is prbably someone who doesn't like the idea of a private message feature in a website like this. I dunno if you have an account in personality cafe. I recommend you make one .</p>
Replying to post #6887 by jt

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 14:02:58 #6871
	You honstly remind of my self when I was a lot younger. I can see definiete simaliarites. You don't care about other peoples feelings? Fine. Don't expect me to treat you with a whole lota respect back. You don't get to make requests. You don't get to start of with "how fucking stupid are you?" and then ask me to do something. You wanna be a little edge lord shit, cool, I can't stop you. I'll compare myself to all I damn well pleas. But nobyes feelings matter anyaways right? So it dosn't matter.

Editing post #6871 by tman <p>You honstly remind of my self when I was a lot younger. I can see definiete simaliarites. You don't care about other peoples feelings? Fine. Don't expect me to treat you with a whole lota respect back. You don't get to make requests. You don't get to start of with "how fucking stupid are you?" and then ask me to do something. You wanna be a little edge lord shit, cool, I can't stop you. I'll compare myself to all I damn well pleas. But nobyes feelings matter anyaways right? So it dosn't matter.</p>
Replying to post #6871 by tman

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/08/02 (Fri) 16:39:21 #6865
	Te is very like the arbitrary character of black sensing. pherhaps it's because i tend to be extremly focused on ideology but i noticed that Te in cf is very oriented towards authoritarianism and that's why i struggle seeing you as Te in cf. But i agree that you are hard to type in CF, that's why i did not voted about your type before a while. I was balanced between the 4 NT type (more likely the introvert of course) for you but could not decided which one . INTP remain my first guess for now but it is one of the typing that may be change on the future. but LII remain the one variable that remain constant abou you. so I will compare you to both INTPs LIIs and INTJs LIIs to make my final judgment later.

Editing post #6865 by fg <p>Te is very like the arbitrary character of black sensing. pherhaps it's because i tend to be extremly focused on ideology but i noticed that Te in cf is very oriented towards authoritarianism and that's why i struggle seeing you as Te in cf. But i agree that you are hard to type in CF, that's why i did not voted about your type before a while. I was balanced between the 4 NT type (more likely the introvert of course) for you but could not decided which one . INTP remain my first guess for now but it is one of the typing that may be change on the future. but LII remain the one variable that remain constant abou you. so I will compare you to both INTPs LIIs and INTJs LIIs to make my final judgment later.</p>
Replying to post #6865 by fg

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/08/02 (Fri) 14:34:28 #6855
	Tman made give me more clue about a cognitive function typing despite giving a wrong results at the end. you are Ti>Te in mbti you seem to dislike the use of academical level of competencies and always require internal logic arguments .in our discussions you did not seem to care about control or any kind of regulations (CF Te related characteristics) when it came to politics or even concerning the chat or the site (you even tend to have a positive view or at least neutral about some chat that are a total mess). In our communication style we are very different (me CF's Te valuer and you CF's Ti valuer). my comments are shorter and want to go at the point while your approach is a little bit more labyrinthic. you seem to not be totally mbti cf Fe blind unlike me. that's why the relation between Marx, Stirner and hengels was a valiable argument for typing Stirner while i tend to dislike this relationship parts of socionics and skip it in most of my work, i don't think the feeling of someone for anyone had to count in a typing, it only tend to base myself on their core belief and general attitude unlike you. your inferior cf Fe tendencies can be added as possible even if we have less visible examples. you seem to have Ne over Se (too abstract and not enough present oriented for an ISTP). so INTP>ISTP. my vote for you is CF INTP for now.

Editing post #6855 by fg <p>Tman made give me more clue about a cognitive function typing despite giving a wrong results at the end. you are Ti>Te in mbti you seem to dislike the use of academical level of competencies and always require internal logic arguments .in our discussions you did not seem to care about control or any kind of regulations (CF Te related characteristics) when it came to politics or even concerning the chat or the site (you even tend to have a positive view or at least neutral about some chat that are a total mess). In our communication style we are very different (me CF's Te valuer and you CF's Ti valuer). my comments are shorter and want to go at the point while your approach is a little bit more labyrinthic. you seem to not be totally mbti cf Fe blind unlike me. that's why the relation between Marx, Stirner and hengels was a valiable argument for typing Stirner while i tend to dislike this relationship parts of socionics and skip it in most of my work, i don't think the feeling of someone for anyone had to count in a typing, it only tend to base myself on their core belief and general attitude unlike you. your inferior cf Fe tendencies can be added as possible even if we have less visible examples. you seem to have Ne over Se (too abstract and not enough present oriented for an ISTP). so INTP>ISTP. my vote for you is CF INTP for now.</p>
Replying to post #6855 by fg

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/31 (Wed) 19:23:46 #6801
	Acutaly I take it back. This entire converstation shows Ne blind. You're constatly demanding I show concrete examples (Se-Si) while failing to see the bigger picture of my arugments. You're able to see the bigger pictures, but only in very limted ways. You can consider posibliltlies, but only from within a Ti framework of how you view the world. You constaitly demand concrete examples, and I give them to you, and you ignor them becuse they don't fit you're ideas what what spsificly you wnated. I'm now 98% sure your ISTP in IDR.

Editing post #6801 by tman <p>Acutaly I take it back. This entire converstation shows Ne blind. You're constatly demanding I show concrete examples (Se-Si) while failing to see the bigger picture of my arugments. You're able to see the bigger pictures, but only in very limted ways. You can consider posibliltlies, but only from within a Ti framework of how you view the world. You constaitly demand concrete examples, and I give them to you, and you ignor them becuse they don't fit you're ideas what what spsificly you wnated. I'm now 98% sure your ISTP in IDR.</p>
Replying to post #6801 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/31 (Wed) 15:01:13 #6798
	Lack of Ne was a bad point. I've said this like 4 time now. It was a bad arugment. It's irelevent to the point I am now making. Yes, INTJs can care about there image. But your reasons for doing so, strick me as pitrulalrly Fe. You seem to belive that someone on the botom of the social hierarchy has dared to question you, and are therefor upset by the fact somone you looked down on as lesser has begun to qestion your status, lead to deep conceren as to how others would see you. You also seem trigered by me questioing you logical framework without what you veiw as sufcent reason, in other words, questioing your Ti framework. Fi arsts may care about there Fe image. INTJ's don't tend to do it for emtional reasons thought, and they sure don't tend to get triggered. I'm certin, your either INTP or ISTP. You have a clear Ti framework from which you view the world, plus your Fe outbursts. You constaitly demand conctre examples, which could be Si, but the fact you don't list any yourself make's me think Se. You're not an INTJ that's for sure, you're a really clear Ti-Fe user. The only other type I would consider considering is INFJ. But you seem more like a lower Fe user. ESTP could also be a posbilty, but they don't tend ot have as strong Ti frameworks at all.

Editing post #6798 by tman <p>Lack of Ne was a bad point. I've said this like 4 time now. It was a bad arugment. It's irelevent to the point I am now making. Yes, INTJs can care about there image. But your reasons for doing so, strick me as pitrulalrly Fe. You seem to belive that someone on the botom of the social hierarchy has dared to question you, and are therefor upset by the fact somone you looked down on as lesser has begun to qestion your status, lead to deep conceren as to how others would see you. You also seem trigered by me questioing you logical framework without what you veiw as sufcent reason, in other words, questioing your Ti framework. Fi arsts may care about there Fe image. INTJ's don't tend to do it for emtional reasons thought, and they sure don't tend to get triggered. I'm certin, your either INTP or ISTP. You have a clear Ti framework from which you view the world, plus your Fe outbursts. You constaitly demand conctre examples, which could be Si, but the fact you don't list any yourself make's me think Se. You're not an INTJ that's for sure, you're a really clear Ti-Fe user. The only other type I would consider considering is INFJ. But you seem more like a lower Fe user. ESTP could also be a posbilty, but they don't tend ot have as strong Ti frameworks at all.</p>
Replying to post #6798 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/30 (Tue) 13:43:40 #6781
	Your shifting the goal post. It's gone form "tell me why you think I'm Ne blind." I do. "Okay but explain this then!" I alrready told you why you have Fe. You're a person, who takes his image VERY serouly. You defently have a main 3 fix. You were really hurt when I impled that this was going to make you not takin serously. You said were upset by stupidty. But I think that's bullshit. I think you really care what others think of you. An Fe blind person is somone who sometimes fails to notice someones feelings, or fails to take them into acout. Your someone who PERTENDS he dosn't how give shit how other people see him. You PRETEND you don't care. But you do. The other's, like Teru and FG have known you longer, so mabye they can give examples. I'm operating of incomplet information, so I'm waiting for clear signs of Ne use to rear it'self. It hasn't yet. Ni has. I mean you yourself voted INTJ in IDR. So Ni makes sense, although I don't think you have it in a dominte postion. You can take a single idea, and run with it, and then another and then another. But I've notice you tend to harp on those singular ideas pretty hard in or conversations. Constatly going back to Ne blind for one, even after I explained it.

Editing post #6781 by tman <p>Your shifting the goal post. It's gone form "tell me why you think I'm Ne blind." I do. "Okay but explain this then!" I alrready told you why you have Fe. You're a person, who takes his image VERY serouly. You defently have a main 3 fix. You were really hurt when I impled that this was going to make you not takin serously. You said were upset by stupidty. But I think that's bullshit. I think you really care what others think of you. An Fe blind person is somone who sometimes fails to notice someones feelings, or fails to take them into acout. Your someone who PERTENDS he dosn't how give shit how other people see him. You PRETEND you don't care. But you do. The other's, like Teru and FG have known you longer, so mabye they can give examples. I'm operating of incomplet information, so I'm waiting for clear signs of Ne use to rear it'self. It hasn't yet. Ni has. I mean you yourself voted INTJ in IDR. So Ni makes sense, although I don't think you have it in a dominte postion. You can take a single idea, and run with it, and then another and then another. But I've notice you tend to harp on those singular ideas pretty hard in or conversations. Constatly going back to Ne blind for one, even after I explained it.</p>
Replying to post #6781 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/30 (Tue) 08:02:24 #6771
	I didn't say no one respected you. I said they were gunna lose respect for you if this is how you behave. Most people's respect isn't based on how well you can type. I honstly would be lieing if I said this hadn't affected how I veiw you. I'd be willing to forgive that. I can totaly see an Ne user doing codeing, but I can also totaly see an Ni user doing it an enjoying it. I don't have a clear sign your Ne blind. I said that was a mistake (as I said before.) I see no clear sings you arn't though. I'm going to bed, it's realy late where I'm at, will talk more in the morning.

Editing post #6771 by tman <p>I didn't say no one respected you. I said they were gunna lose respect for you if this is how you behave. Most people's respect isn't based on how well you can type. I honstly would be lieing if I said this hadn't affected how I veiw you. I'd be willing to forgive that. I can totaly see an Ne user doing codeing, but I can also totaly see an Ni user doing it an enjoying it. I don't have a clear sign your Ne blind. I said that was a mistake (as I said before.) I see no clear sings you arn't though. I'm going to bed, it's realy late where I'm at, will talk more in the morning. </p>
Replying to post #6771 by tman

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/07/30 (Tue) 03:53:52 #6770
	hey, hey calm down i have something to say to both of you. Tman: i won't change my mind about Phsc's competency because of a fight he have with you.I can see where you ISTP vote (ti dom+fe inferior could work for him) come from but i disagree with your argumental basis, your focus on loop, grip and other bullshit theory that made me abandon the cognitive function system for socionics, you focus too much on a Ti-Ni perspective for him that you even considered INFJ above INTJ for him which is very umprobable as an order of possibility for him. i think you should instead if he show Ne over Se. and he is obviously Ne over Se (too much focus on possibilities for a Ne blind). so if he is IXTP, he is INTP. you tend too much too just heterodoxical path that rarely came from nowhere but i think you use the wrong patterns. Phsc: i think you are too disdaignous about the cognitive function system. of course it have a ton of bullshit but let's face it all typology system have this kind of problem (socionics got most of the reinin dichotomy and gulenko's cognitive style as example), enneagram have a big unexplained part about the wing correlation with type etc... calling it "function magic" like most sheep in here is kind of low for someone as competent as you.

Editing post #6770 by fg <p>hey, hey calm down i have something to say to both of you.</p> <p>Tman: i won't change my mind about Phsc's competency because of a fight he have with you.I can see where you ISTP vote (ti dom+fe inferior could work for him) come from but i disagree with your argumental basis, your focus on loop, grip and other bullshit theory that made me abandon the cognitive function system for socionics, you focus too much on a Ti-Ni perspective for him that you even considered INFJ above INTJ for him which is very umprobable as an order of possibility for him. i think you should instead if he show Ne over Se. and he is obviously Ne over Se (too much focus on possibilities for a Ne blind). so if he is IXTP, he is INTP. you tend too much too just heterodoxical path that rarely came from nowhere but i think you use the wrong patterns.</p> <p>Phsc: i think you are too disdaignous about the cognitive function system. of course it have a ton of bullshit but let's face it all typology system have this kind of problem (socionics got most of the reinin dichotomy and gulenko's cognitive style as example), enneagram have a big unexplained part about the wing correlation with type etc... calling it "function magic" like most sheep in here is kind of low for someone as competent as you.</p>
Replying to post #6770 by fg

	LadyX intp 5 2019/07/30 (Tue) 05:27:12 #6767
	I generally like phsc's typology sense. I voted a "1" due to the periodic expressions of anger, along with a perfectionistic outlook on spelling and other things - an alternative might be a "5" going to counterphobic mode. Many times I've seen a fun person just enjoying the absurdity of some of the entries and making key contributions.

Editing post #6767 by LadyX <p>I generally like phsc's typology sense.</p> <p>I voted a "1" due to the periodic expressions of anger, along with a perfectionistic outlook on spelling and other things - an alternative might be a "5" going to counterphobic mode.</p> <p>Many times I've seen a fun person just enjoying the absurdity of some of the entries and making key contributions.</p>
Replying to post #6767 by LadyX

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/30 (Tue) 02:57:59 #6762
	I rember having an example, but I can't find it. I'll try and post it next time. I still stand by my destion, becuse you still seem have a pretty strong, Ni, but I think your a lower Fe user. I don't think you'r Ni is doment. You realy do seem like a Ti dom (your disciption of Ne sounds more like Ti, computer programing is about inetnral logic, so is Ti. There's nothing keeping Ne users from it, but I would asocatie it with Ne. Ti is more oriented on solving logical problems.) I could see INTP with an exeptionly strong Ti infulince. Honstly, the whole Ne thing is more just me laching onto a single data point and extrating to much form it. That's what I meant by Ti-Si loop. I take point of informatoion, grab onto it, and fail to take into acount all the other little data point, extraplating way to much form it. In this case, I don't even rember the data point. I think that what makes me such a bad typist. If I rember correctly I called you all those thing after you said I was the stupidest person you had ever seen, so you fired the first shot. All I did was type you baddly. If all you care about are the ideas, then spelling errorers can be ingored, can't they? You understood what I meant. So it's almost like this wasn't about logic at all. It's almost like it was about proving you were better then me, becuse you looked down on me.It's almost like this entire converstation was a just an attempt to one up me. Like they don't care about truth, but about ponage. Working in good faith matters, becuse otherwise, your wasting your time on someone who dosn't vaule truth. But your most recent post has shown me that's may not be true. You may just be an honset guy whose having a bad day. You seem to really want to know. I meant what I said about that desire for "inelcutal pownge." I also meant what I said about that kind of thinking being unhelpfull and dumb.I told myself that what I wanted was to not waste my time on a discution with someone who didn't care. But mabye there's a part of me that just didn't want to admit that I couldn't rember why I thought you were Ne blind. I need to be I'm okay having been wrong, so long as it helps me towrds being right.

Editing post #6762 by tman <p>I rember having an example, but I can't find it. I'll try and post it next time. I still stand by my destion, becuse you still seem have a pretty strong, Ni, but I think your a lower Fe user. I don't think you'r Ni is doment. You realy do seem like a Ti dom (your disciption of Ne sounds more like Ti, computer programing is about inetnral logic, so is Ti. There's nothing keeping Ne users from it, but I would asocatie it with Ne. Ti is more oriented on solving logical problems.) I could see INTP with an exeptionly strong Ti infulince. Honstly, the whole Ne thing is more just me laching onto a single data point and extrating to much form it. That's what I meant by Ti-Si loop. I take point of informatoion, grab onto it, and fail to take into acount all the other little data point, extraplating way to much form it. In this case, I don't even rember the data point. I think that what makes me such a bad typist.</p> <p>If I rember correctly I called you all those thing after you said I was the stupidest person you had ever seen, so you fired the first shot. All I did was type you baddly.</p> <p>If all you care about are the ideas, then spelling errorers can be ingored, can't they? You understood what I meant. So it's almost like this wasn't about logic at all. It's almost like it was about proving you were better then me, becuse you looked down on me.It's almost like this entire converstation was a just an attempt to one up me. Like they don't care about truth, but about ponage.</p> <p>Working in good faith matters, becuse otherwise, your wasting your time on someone who dosn't vaule truth. But your most recent post has shown me that's may not be true. You may just be an honset guy whose having a bad day. You seem to really want to know.</p> <p>I meant what I said about that desire for "inelcutal pownge." I also meant what I said about that kind of thinking being unhelpfull and dumb.I told myself that what I wanted was to not waste my time on a discution with someone who didn't care. But mabye there's a part of me that just didn't want to admit that I couldn't rember why I thought you were Ne blind. I need to be I'm okay having been wrong, so long as it helps me towrds being right.</p>
Replying to post #6762 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/30 (Tue) 00:18:30 #6759
	You have a wall of text in which you make serveral point with no pucation, and then get frustrated when I didn't mention all of them when I go back and try and do what you asked. You talk about how everthing should just be about the argments, and then you run into tyrades of how everyone hates me. You swich form "fuck you retard" to "stop making adhomin attacks" to "You're an idot and stop making ad homine attacks." The reason why I left wasn't becuse I was running away. I could just not respond to you at all. I wanted to give you some time to cool down so you didn't emmbarce yourself. . And then against my better jugment, I came back. You want me to try and explain myself to you? I have. I would be more then happy to try and do it better, if I had the imperstion you were acting in good faith. But you havn't given me that imprestion. You're not worth my effort or my time. I've given far more of it to you then you deserive.

Editing post #6759 by tman <p> You have a wall of text in which you make serveral point with no pucation, and then get frustrated when I didn't mention all of them when I go back and try and do what you asked. You talk about how everthing should just be about the argments, and then you run into tyrades of how everyone hates me. You swich form "fuck you retard" to "stop making adhomin attacks" to "You're an idot and stop making ad homine attacks." The reason why I left wasn't becuse I was running away. I could just not respond to you at all. I wanted to give you some time to cool down so you didn't emmbarce yourself. . And then against my better jugment, I came back. You want me to try and explain myself to you? I have. I would be more then happy to try and do it better, if I had the imperstion you were acting in good faith. But you havn't given me that imprestion. You're not worth my effort or my time. I've given far more of it to you then you deserive.</p> <p> </p>
Replying to post #6759 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 23:24:16 #6757
	To be clear, my intent with the bellow isn't to misrepresent PSCH, but to give a general impression of the conversation. If you wanna know what's going on, start form my first comment on this page and start scrolling up. It's important to note the protestation of the insults, and how my behavior changed as PSCH continued to hurl insults at me. Pay attention to who started the insults. If you don't care, don't bother with it. You might get a laugh though.

Editing post #6757 by tman <p>To be clear, my intent with the bellow isn't to misrepresent PSCH, but to give a general impression of the conversation. If you wanna know what's going on, start form my first comment on this page and start scrolling up. It's important to note the protestation of the insults, and how my behavior changed as PSCH continued to hurl insults at me. Pay attention to who started the insults. If you don't care, don't bother with it. You might get a laugh though.</p>
Replying to post #6757 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 23:12:17 #6756
	Okay, so I'm back. First off, I suspecting you thinking I'm taco isn't something any claim I can make will disprove, so that's all I'm gunna say about it. Lets look at some qoutes from PSCH, "I'm not sure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded..." "that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing." "Just that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing ." "I am not doing hysterical screaming, I am just quesitoning you being a retard... you also are being hypocritical because you also did virtual screaming WHEN TYPING LIKE THIS, which indicates you could be Taco which is a valid theory not many people join this community, and Taco likes trolling" Latter in the argmunt I said this: "Okay, your starting to sound as incoherent as I normally do, but angerer. I'm glad senpai FG likes your work, but that was before today's outburst. I'm not sure if he will respond as positively to your recent comments.I don't wanna speak for him, but he doesn't strike me as a guy who responds well to hysterical screaming. I'm not saying your not a decent typest, or that your dumb. I'm saying your behaving inmaturly. 4w5 makes sense for me, as I've already said, based on how I act on this cite. I use the term "asburgers" when I meant "autistic", which you had mentioned before you might be. It's not a dirty word man. I can see why you would think I was using it as an insult, and for that I really do owe you an apology. I'm gonna give you an hour or two to calm down. Don't expect any responses till then." And your respond with. "I am not behaving in a imature way, first of all maturity is not even objective, you're just running from the arguments using a crappy ad hominem about me not being mature because you don't have arguments, literally a sophist." ... Yes. Clearly, I am the one making ad hominin attacks. None of these comments count as ad homin falcies, becuse I never said "you were rude, therefor you wrong about MBTI," and you never said "Your an idiot, therefor your wrong about MBTI." Insults are not in and of themselves adhomin attacks. An adhomin attack is attack somone personily in odder to despuite there argument. I am not requiered to have converstations with people who constaly call me a retard. Even if I do end up leaving, you wouldn't be able to claim it was becuse I didn't have any argemnts, becuse it could just as easly be that I was tiered of being insulted. Forchenetly I'm more board then I am teired of being insulsted. Having a "blind" funtion isn't a bad thing, evey type has one in most theores I've (often by difrent names.) Think of it less as "Blind" like Steve Wonder, and more like a blind spot, something that can trip you up, or that you can fail to take into consideration. It's possible you didn't know that, and that I was just saying "You're an ISTP becuse you suck." These qoutes prove nothing. Phsc could just as easaily take everthing I've said out of context in order to prove what a jerk I am. If you wanna know what happened, look back at the qoutes yourself.

Editing post #6756 by tman <p>Okay, so I'm back. First off, I suspecting you thinking I'm taco isn't something any claim I can make will disprove, so that's all I'm gunna say about it. Lets look at some qoutes from PSCH,</p> <p><span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">"I'm not sure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded..."</span></span></p> <p><span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">"that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing."</span></span></p> <p><span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">"Just that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing</span></span> ."</p> <p><span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">"I am not doing hysterical screaming, I am just quesitoning you being a retard... you also are being hypocritical because you also did virtual screaming WHEN TYPING LIKE THIS, which indicates you could be Taco which is a valid theory not many people join this community, and Taco likes trolling</span></span>"</p> <p>Latter in the argmunt I said this: "Okay, your starting to sound as incoherent as I normally do, but angerer. I'm glad senpai FG likes your work, but that was before today's outburst. I'm not sure if he will respond as positively to your recent comments.I don't wanna speak for him, but he doesn't strike me as a guy who responds well to hysterical screaming. I'm not saying your not a decent typest, or that your dumb. I'm saying your behaving inmaturly. 4w5 makes sense for me, as I've already said, based on how I act on this cite. I use the term "asburgers" when I meant "autistic", which you had mentioned before you might be. It's not a dirty word man. I can see why you would think I was using it as an insult, and for that I really do owe you an apology. I'm gonna give you an hour or two to calm down. Don't expect any responses till then."</p> <p>And your respond with.</p> <p><span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">"I am not behaving in a imature way, first of all maturity is not even objective, you're just running from the arguments using a crappy ad hominem about me not being mature because you don't have arguments, literally a sophist</span></span>."</p> <p>...</p> <p>Yes. Clearly, I am the one making ad hominin attacks.</p> <p>None of these comments count as ad homin falcies, becuse I never said "you were rude, therefor you wrong about MBTI," and you never said "Your an idiot, therefor your wrong about MBTI." Insults are not in and of themselves adhomin attacks. An adhomin attack is attack somone personily in odder to despuite there argument.</p> <p>I am not requiered to have converstations with people who constaly call me a retard. Even if I do end up leaving, you wouldn't be able to claim it was becuse I didn't have any argemnts, becuse it could just as easly be that I was tiered of being insulted. Forchenetly I'm more board then I am teired of being insulsted.</p> <p>Having a "blind" funtion isn't a bad thing, evey type has one in most theores I've (often by difrent names.) Think of it less as "Blind" like Steve Wonder, and more like a blind spot, something that can trip you up, or that you can fail to take into consideration. It's possible you didn't know that, and that I was just saying "You're an ISTP becuse you suck."</p> <p>These qoutes prove nothing. Phsc could just as easaily take everthing I've said out of context in order to prove what a jerk I am. If you wanna know what happened, look back at the qoutes yourself.</p> <p> </p>
Replying to post #6756 by tman

	Taco110 Ni-Se you'll see ST 2019/07/29 (Mon) 21:20:59 #6753
	Lmao @ the notion of me being tman. Hey phsc, you present interesting points as to why and how I could be tman, but you don't have any actual, concrete and tangible evidence as to why I am. Instead of going behind my back and baselessly insinuating that I am tman without any actual evidence you could simply man up and talk to me one-on-one about why you think I am in direct messages. It's not hard to do at all.

Editing post #6753 by Taco110 <p>Lmao @ the notion of me being tman. Hey phsc, you present interesting points as to why and how I could be tman, but you don't have any actual, concrete and tangible evidence as to why I am. Instead of going behind my back and baselessly insinuating that I am tman without any actual evidence you could simply man up and talk to me one-on-one about why you think I am in direct messages. It's not hard to do at all.</p>
Replying to post #6753 by Taco110

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 20:43:20 #6746
	Okay, your starting to sound as incoherent as I normally do, but angerer. I'm glad senpai FG likes your work, but that was before today's outburst. I'm not sure if he will respond as positively to your recent comments.I don't wanna speak for him, but he doesn't strike me as a guy who responds well to hysterical screaming. I'm not saying your not a decent typest, or that your dumb. I'm saying your behaving inmaturly. 4w5 makes sense for me, as I've already said, based on how I act on this cite. I use the term "asburgers" when I meant "autistic", which you had mentioned before you might be. It's not a dirty word man. I can see why you would think I was using it as an insult, and for that I really do owe you an apology. I'm gonna give you an hour or two to calm down. Don't expect any responses till then.

Editing post #6746 by tman <p>Okay, your starting to sound as incoherent as I normally do, but angerer. I'm glad senpai FG likes your work, but that was before today's outburst. I'm not sure if he will respond as positively to your recent comments.I don't wanna speak for him, but he doesn't strike me as a guy who responds well to hysterical screaming. I'm not saying your not a decent typest, or that your dumb. I'm saying your behaving inmaturly. 4w5 makes sense for me, as I've already said, based on how I act on this cite. I use the term "asburgers" when I meant "autistic", which you had mentioned before you might be. It's not a dirty word man. I can see why you would think I was using it as an insult, and for that I really do owe you an apology. I'm gonna give you an hour or two to calm down. Don't expect any responses till then.</p>
Replying to post #6746 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 19:55:02 #6742
	"How dumb are you? How am I blind Ne?... unsure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded, maybe you might be right about all of your stupid votes and maybe they aren't stupid but you don't explain them, not even fucking jt who literally RANDOMIZES TYPES FOR PEOPLE is this bad with typology, really, congratulations, you might be the dumbest person I've ever fucking seen.?" Gee bad at Fe? Never would have geused, your such a charming fellow :P. This kind of outbust is the kinda shit I'm talking about (look at Teru's page for more examples of it.) This is what happens when you get a frustrated Fe infierorer. For an example of this in my self, look at Jean Pual Sartes page, and you'll see me doing something simliler. This kind of outburst is not typical of Fe blind. It is of Fe infeiror. The fact you react this way shows blind Ne. I know that sounds like I'm saying I'm gonna say you have blind Ne no matter what, but bare with me. Ne is the ability to see multiple possibility in the abstract, understanding new ideas in the moment. PHSC, your utterly terrible at that. FG for example (INTJ) tends to argue with me mostly using Ni, but tends to acknowledge there could be at least some possibility I'm not entirely wrong, even when I really am kinda full of shit. You can kinda tell internally he has no idea what I'm on about, (once again, most of the time it's because I have incomplete information) but his response is to simply say he disagrees, and either leave it at that, or polity tell me why he thinks I'm wrong. Blind Ni means that you don't consider there to be value in considering purely abstract musings of other people, especially when it contradicts your Ti-Ni. In the other ISTP I know, this comes out very differently, more of a "whats the point of arguing" kind way, because he doesn't think he'll change his mind, and kinda assumes others are the same way, but I think the core cause is the same. INFJ is a terrible typing I'll give you that. I'm pretty sure you have at least some of the INFJ functions. INFJ doesn't really work though, you're pretty clearly a low Fe user, probably as a fourth function. Unless you just have a REALY underdeveoped 2nd function, which asburgers might impair, but you DEFENTLY don't have blind Te. Why do you assume Se has anything to do with social skills? I chose to ignore Se because, quite frankly, I'm not sure what I would be looking for. Se is my blind function, so I have a very abstract, skeletal framework understanding of what it is and dose, so I'm not sure how easily I could find it in other people. Hence why I left it to you to deiced. If you want to be taken seriously and given peoples time and energy, I suggest you stop acting like a petulant child. I really hope your not just another asshole on the internet, and that your not this hard headed in real life, because otherwise, I just wasted a lot of my time. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, because, beneath your temper tantrums, you have points worth responding to. I think your right in that I need to form more detailed arguments, but If you can't disagree with me in the future without resorting to hysterical hissy fits and petty insults, I won't wast my time. I'll respond, but I see no reason to write in any kind of detail. There's a part of me that wants to use this in an attempt to put you down, because I'm pretty annoyed right now. But I don't think that part of me is very helpful, and you don't really desire that after being kinda a jerk on the internet once, so I'm hoping I'm this doesn't come of as an intellectual dick meseruing contest. Debate shouldn't be about trying to get "ponege."

Editing post #6742 by tman <p>"How dumb are you? How am I blind Ne?<span style="color:red"><span style="color:red/font">... unsure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded, maybe you might be right about all of your stupid votes and maybe they aren't stupid but you don't explain them, not even fucking jt who literally RANDOMIZES TYPES FOR PEOPLE is this bad with typology, really, congratulations, you might be the dumbest person I've ever fucking seen.</span></span>?"</p> <p>Gee bad at Fe? Never would have geused, your such a charming fellow :P. This kind of outbust is the kinda shit I'm talking about (look at Teru's page for more examples of it.) This is what happens when you get a frustrated Fe infierorer. For an example of this in my self, look at Jean Pual Sartes page, and you'll see me doing something simliler. This kind of outburst is not typical of Fe blind. It is of Fe infeiror.</p> <p>The fact you react this way shows blind Ne. I know that sounds like I'm saying I'm gonna say you have blind Ne no matter what, but bare with me. Ne is the ability to see multiple possibility in the abstract, understanding new ideas in the moment. PHSC, your utterly terrible at that. FG for example (INTJ) tends to argue with me mostly using Ni, but tends to acknowledge there could be at least some possibility I'm not entirely wrong, even when I really am kinda full of shit. You can kinda tell internally he has no idea what I'm on about, (once again, most of the time it's because I have incomplete information) but his response is to simply say he disagrees, and either leave it at that, or polity tell me why he thinks I'm wrong. Blind Ni means that you don't consider there to be value in considering purely abstract musings of other people, especially when it contradicts your Ti-Ni. In the other ISTP I know, this comes out very differently, more of a "whats the point of arguing" kind way, because he doesn't think he'll change his mind, and kinda assumes others are the same way, but I think the core cause is the same. </p> <p>INFJ is a terrible typing I'll give you that. I'm pretty sure you have at least some of the INFJ functions. INFJ doesn't really work though, you're pretty clearly a low Fe user, probably as a fourth function. Unless you just have a REALY underdeveoped 2nd function, which asburgers might impair, but you DEFENTLY don't have blind Te.</p> <p>Why do you assume Se has anything to do with social skills? I chose to ignore Se because, quite frankly, I'm not sure what I would be looking for. Se is my blind function, so I have a very abstract, skeletal framework understanding of what it is and dose, so I'm not sure how easily I could find it in other people. Hence why I left it to you to deiced.</p> <p>If you want to be taken seriously and given peoples time and energy, I suggest you stop acting like a petulant child. I really hope your not just another asshole on the internet, and that your not this hard headed in real life, because otherwise, I just wasted a lot of my time. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, because, beneath your temper tantrums, you have points worth responding to. I think your right in that I need to form more detailed arguments, but If you can't disagree with me in the future without resorting to hysterical hissy fits and petty insults, I won't wast my time. I'll respond, but I see no reason to write in any kind of detail.</p> <p>There's a part of me that wants to use this in an attempt to put you down, because I'm pretty annoyed right now. But I don't think that part of me is very helpful, and you don't really desire that after being kinda a jerk on the internet once, so I'm hoping I'm this doesn't come of as an intellectual dick meseruing contest. Debate shouldn't be about trying to get "ponege." </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Replying to post #6742 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 18:43:47 #6738
	Then again, people can sometimes strugle with there Second fuction (I sometimes get caught in a Ti-Si loop) so it's not so much about ability or how much you use it, so much as how well you use it when your funtioning well.The fact your not "fully N" seems to be a clue. That's a pretty distinctly ISXP/ENXJ trait. INXPs/ESXJs tend to have more of a clear preference for there type.

Editing post #6738 by tman <p>Then again, people can sometimes strugle with there Second fuction (I sometimes get caught in a Ti-Si loop) so it's not so much about ability or how much you use it, so much as how well you use it when your funtioning well.The fact your not "fully N" seems to be a clue. That's a pretty distinctly ISXP/ENXJ trait. INXPs/ESXJs tend to have more of a clear preference for there type. </p>
Replying to post #6738 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 18:34:46 #6736
	I like to not fully comit, just in case, when i have limited info about a person. It's not so much saying your only partly an introvert, or partly a thinker, so much as it is the percentige of certinety I have about your type. That's the way I use it, and becuse of how this webcite is set up, people with more infromation get more influnce then me. I could honstly see you as INFJ in terms fuctions but that's not supper relvent. I still say the most likly a Ti dom in terms of functions (IDR), but I'm not so sure, INTJ is also a posbility. The only problem there is I don't think you have Blind Fe.

Editing post #6736 by tman <p>I like to not fully comit, just in case, when i have limited info about a person. It's not so much saying your only partly an introvert, or partly a thinker, so much as it is the percentige of certinety I have about your type. That's the way I use it, and becuse of how this webcite is set up, people with more infromation get more influnce then me. I could honstly see you as INFJ in terms fuctions but that's not supper relvent. I still say the most likly a Ti dom in terms of functions (IDR), but I'm not so sure, INTJ is also a posbility. The only problem there is I don't think you have Blind Fe.</p>
Replying to post #6736 by tman

Teru Mikami 2019/06/26 (Wed) 14:23:48 #6516
SLE-Se subtype: "Appearance The sensory subtype is witty and impulsive. While seemingly concealing within them latent threats they appear unappeasable. However, they are sharp, aggressive and persevering people. Notably resourceful, they are able to manifest vindictiveness in doses that make life for their ill-wishers simply intolerable. Their character appears full of contrasts and unpredictability. Towards those whom they love they are often tender, even sentimental. Their sense of humor easily incorporates sarcasm and caustic irony. Are talkative, charming, witty, critical and sharp, love epithets and slang expressions. Their movements are fast and gait centered, When walking their slightly bent knees provide them with an ingratiating feline resemblance. Appreciate life and tend to watch over their health, periodically exercising through sports/gymnastics. Dresses tastefully and expensively. Usually provide a bright impression of a self-assured and prospering person Character The persistent, energetic and determined man. Seeking his acts both directly and through intermediaries. He usually manages to become a winner. Knows how to manage people, they can impose their will and desire, draws useful and interesting things. Knows how to please: charming, humorous, a good conversationalist. It's a natural leader: it requires a struggle, the excitement, winning, without its vitality declines. Boredom - his mortal enemy. The lack of decent employment of forces makes it very difficult partner. Configured for large real purpose, but often have difficulty in choosing them. Long swings, doubts, considering. But if the choice is made, acts quickly, picking up the pace and not calming down until it succeeds. This is a very resourceful and flexible tactics. Active and energetic, in periods of expansion develops uncommon performance. He does not like unsolicited advice, preferring to make their own decisions. Maybe listen to the interlocutor, but the last word is usually reserves. Clerk does not make a tone when it pressured - strongly fighting back. In the interest of the case shows diplomatic skills, courtesy and kindness. It does not like it when others take the initiative, it may seem out of place: for example, something imposed or rushed - in this case can do the opposite. Very proud and touchy, but tries to hide it, considering his weakness. Do not forgive tactlessness and injustice to himself. This may cause him outbreak of aggression. Insightful, witty, has a critical mind. In anger, showing intolerance to others' shortcomings. Knows how to give a brief description of the man, and capacious, with ridicule in the case of the presence of strangers, "put in a puddle." Actively promotes the interests of their own, and loved ones. Undesirable people could create an unfavorable environment, but to those whom he loves, he tries to provide the necessary comfort, showing attention and care. Proud of their success and achieves a high estimate of his personality. Has a tendency to overestimate their own merits, which leads to arrogance and the desire to teach others. Self-confidence and lack of self-criticism did not facilitate his relationship with others. Respects people influential and respected. Forgiving of flexible, soft and defenseless, in need of assistance, especially to children. Often they provide protection and support. However, strict, even harsh at home and at work. Very stubborn and demanding. In personal relationships difficult to adapt to the partner, as a fairly uncompromising. Effort of will can make sense of a subordinate to reason, proud and independent. It is often unpredictable in their actions, depends on the variability of mood. Pretty unstable in hobbies, but his affection tries to keep a long time. Values ??of the old friendship, although sentiment in the relationship usually does not show. Strives for a high material standard of living. He has a good aesthetic taste, gourmet, can not deny myself that gives him pleasure. Durst in sex, but suspicious of love, afraid to be deceived in their hopes, wishful thinking. Quickly get tired of the monotony: he impresses psychological game with a partner, when hope is replaced by doubt - this is an element of excitement."

Editing post #6516 by Teru Mikami <p>SLE-Se subtype: "Appearance</p> <p>The sensory subtype is witty and impulsive. While seemingly concealing within them latent threats they appear unappeasable. However, they are sharp, aggressive and persevering people. Notably resourceful, they are able to manifest vindictiveness in doses that make life for their ill-wishers simply intolerable. Their character appears full of contrasts and unpredictability. Towards those whom they love they are often tender, even sentimental. Their sense of humor easily incorporates sarcasm and caustic irony. Are talkative, charming, witty, critical and sharp, love epithets and slang expressions. Their movements are fast and gait centered, When walking their slightly bent knees provide them with an ingratiating feline resemblance. Appreciate life and tend to watch over their health, periodically exercising through sports/gymnastics. Dresses tastefully and expensively. Usually provide a bright impression of a self-assured and prospering person</p> <p>Character</p> <p>The persistent, energetic and determined man. Seeking his acts both directly and through intermediaries. He usually manages to become a winner. Knows how to manage people, they can impose their will and desire, draws useful and interesting things. <strong>Knows how to please: charming</strong>, humorous, a good conversationalist. It's a natural leader: it requires a struggle, the excitement, winning, without its vitality declines. Boredom - his mortal enemy. The lack of decent employment of forces makes it very difficult partner.</p> <p>Configured for large real purpose, but often have difficulty in choosing them. Long swings, doubts, considering. But if the choice is made, acts quickly, picking up the pace and not calming down until it succeeds. This is a very resourceful and flexible tactics. Active and energetic, in periods of expansion develops uncommon performance. He does not like unsolicited advice, preferring to make their own decisions. Maybe listen to the interlocutor, but the last word is usually reserves. Clerk does not make a tone when it pressured - strongly fighting back. In the interest of the case shows diplomatic skills, courtesy and kindness.</p> <p>It does not like it when others take the initiative, it may seem out of place: for example, something imposed or rushed - in this case can do the opposite. Very proud and touchy, but tries to hide it, considering his weakness. Do not forgive tactlessness and injustice to himself. This may cause him outbreak of aggression.</p> <p>Insightful, witty, has a critical mind. In anger, showing intolerance to others' shortcomings. Knows how to give a brief description of the man, and capacious, with ridicule in the case of the presence of strangers, "put in a puddle." Actively promotes the interests of their own, and loved ones. Undesirable people could create an unfavorable environment, but to those whom he loves, he tries to provide the necessary comfort, showing attention and care.</p> <p>Proud of their success and achieves a high estimate of his personality. Has a tendency to overestimate their own merits, which leads to arrogance and the desire to teach others. Self-confidence and lack of self-criticism did not facilitate his relationship with others. Respects people influential and respected. Forgiving of flexible, soft and defenseless, in need of assistance, especially to children. Often they provide protection and support. However, strict, even harsh at home and at work.</p> <p>Very stubborn and demanding. In personal relationships difficult to adapt to the partner, as a fairly uncompromising. Effort of will can make sense of a subordinate to reason, proud and independent. It is often unpredictable in their actions, depends on the variability of mood. Pretty unstable in hobbies, but his affection tries to keep a long time. Values ??of the old friendship, although sentiment in the relationship usually does not show.</p> <p>Strives for a high material standard of living. He has a good aesthetic taste, gourmet, can not deny myself that gives him pleasure. Durst in sex, but suspicious of love, afraid to be deceived in their hopes, wishful thinking. Quickly get tired of the monotony: he impresses psychological game with a partner, when hope is replaced by doubt - this is an element of excitement."</p>
Replying to post #6516 by Teru Mikami

	jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg 2019/06/10 (Mon) 15:16:30 #6359
	INTJ's my vote. Also can you solve this math problem A water trough is 12 meters long with a semi-circular cross section of radius 0.8 meters. The trough and its cross section are shown below. The pictures are not to scale. The trough is being ﬁlled at a rate of 0.3 cubic meters per minute. At what rate is the angle θ shown changing when it is 2π/3 radians? Give an exact answer with units https://sites.math.washington.edu/~m124/source/Exams/Final/final_18aut/124finalAut18.pdf

Editing post #6359 by jt <p>INTJ's my vote. Also can you solve this math problem</p> <p>A water trough is 12 meters long with a semi-circular cross section of radius 0.8 meters. The trough and its cross section are shown below. The pictures are not to scale. The trough is being ﬁlled at a rate of 0.3 cubic meters per minute. At what rate is the angle θ shown changing when it is 2π/3 radians? Give an exact answer with units</p> <p>https://sites.math.washington.edu/~m124/source/Exams/Final/final_18aut/124finalAut18.pdf </p>
Replying to post #6359 by jt

bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/03/22 (Fri) 15:59:07 #5663
What is your obsession with diverting the attention away from your typing? You keep bringing up the alts that I made ages ago which are no longer relevant. This is another prime example of your super-ego pull. What is sad is your constant avoidance of being a type 6 because of untrue assumptions on their abilities. An actual 5w6 wouldn't insinuate that security is the norm because they are avoidant at heart. Security may be the norm for most 6s and 9s but not the other types.

Editing post #5663 by bioomer2 <p>What is your obsession with diverting the attention away from your typing? You keep bringing up the alts that I made ages ago which are no longer relevant. This is another prime example of your super-ego pull. What is sad is your constant avoidance of being a type 6 because of untrue assumptions on their abilities. An actual 5w6 wouldn't insinuate that security is the norm because they are avoidant at heart. Security may be the norm for most 6s and 9s but not the other types.</p>
Replying to post #5663 by bioomer2

bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/03/22 (Fri) 15:42:54 #5659
Look, I never said anyone was a 6 to get on their nerves. I see all the types on the same level. It is you that seems to that being an intuitive and a 6 somehow makes them less intuitive. If you focus on the motives and fears then why do you proceed to take a lot of stock into what result you get? Practice what you claim you do.

Editing post #5659 by bioomer2 <p>Look, I never said anyone was a 6 to get on their nerves. I see all the types on the same level. It is you that seems to that being an intuitive and a 6 somehow makes them less intuitive. If you focus on the motives and fears then why do you proceed to take a lot of stock into what result you get? Practice what you claim you do. </p>
Replying to post #5659 by bioomer2

bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/03/22 (Fri) 14:56:26 #5656
Your actions make your motives clear. You keep seeking guidance from the tests like most 6s do and you have proven many times to be reactive and super ego-influenced. 5w6s can be paranoid but i'm not basing this purely on paranoia. I'm only a troll because i'm not saying you're a 5 like you want. Judging by your opinion on enneagram 6 intuitives, i'm not surprised that there is hestitation to identify as such.

Editing post #5656 by bioomer2 <p>Your actions make your motives clear. You keep seeking guidance from the tests like most 6s do and you have proven many times to be reactive and super ego-influenced. 5w6s can be paranoid but i'm not basing this purely on paranoia.</p> <p> </p> <p>I'm only a troll because i'm not saying you're a 5 like you want. Judging by your opinion on enneagram 6 intuitives, i'm not surprised that there is hestitation to identify as such. </p>
Replying to post #5656 by bioomer2

date	username	vote
22/03/29 12:32	GIJOEBusta Cap	INTJ
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	INTJ
21/01/17 23:46	Jacobus	INTJ
20/11/02 09:33	Flower-like	ITJ
20/05/02 08:11	kashifirfanbhatti	INTJ
19/12/29 15:53	poised	INTP
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	ISTJ
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	INTJ
19/12/26 02:16	Fuzzy	INTJ
19/09/30 15:38	BasedGOD	INTJ
20/03/12 10:15	Thyssen	INTJ
19/09/22 20:45	ethan	INFP
19/09/03 12:49	Teru Mikami	N
19/08/01 02:50	ally	INT
20/01/08 23:11	Tch	INTJ
19/07/03 03:03	LadyX	INTJ
20/02/22 19:27	Tman	INTJ
19/06/10 15:23	jt	xNTJ
19/05/31 21:47	Robosheep	ENTJ
20/10/14 09:46	Diobono	INTJ
19/05/03 16:42	fg	INTJ
19/07/14 11:49	HairyBALLS-	INTJ
19/01/23 19:19	Taco110	INTJ

date	username	vote
22/02/08 21:56	GIJOEBusta Cap	INTP
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	INTJ
20/10/03 10:01	Flower-like	INTJ
20/05/24 19:38	fleetingpetals1	ENTJ
20/05/02 08:11	kashifirfanbhatti	INTJ
19/12/29 15:58	poised	INTP
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	ISTJ
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	INTJ
19/12/26 02:16	Fuzzy	INTP
19/09/30 15:38	BasedGOD	INTP
19/09/27 23:01	Thyssen	INTJ
19/08/02 14:34	fg	INTP
19/08/03 21:00	ally	INTJ
20/02/22 19:27	Tman	INTP
19/09/27 13:52	Teru Mikami	INTP
19/11/18 05:50	Diobono	INTJ
19/05/29 01:06	Taco110	INTJ
19/03/29 06:02	Reddit	ISTJ

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:34	fleetingpetals1	cp6w5
22/02/08 21:56	GIJOEBusta Cap	5w6
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	5w6
21/01/17 23:47	Jacobus	5w6
20/07/14 12:50	Flower-like	5w6
20/06/14 08:56	EverybodyLovesNi	cp5w6
20/05/02 08:11	kashifirfanbhatti	5w6
20/01/08 23:11	Tch	5w6
19/12/29 15:53	poised	cp6w5
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	6w5
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	5w6
20/01/23 18:44	Fuzzy	5w6
19/09/30 15:38	BasedGOD	cp6w5
19/09/27 23:01	Thyssen	5w6
19/08/01 02:21	Ally	5w6
19/07/03 03:03	LadyX	1w9
19/06/24 14:02	Ch-ngch-ng	cp6w5
19/06/10 10:31	jt	3w4
19/05/19 05:57	Phantom	5w6
19/04/20 14:56	tman	5w6
19/04/16 11:42	DIobono	5w6
19/03/29 18:12	fg	5w6
19/03/13 20:29	bioomer	6w5
19/08/29 17:36	Teru Mikami	cp6w7
19/01/23 19:19	Taco110	5w6

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:34	fleetingpetals1	sx/so
22/02/08 21:56	GIJOEBusta Cap	sp/so
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	so/sp
20/09/07 05:05	Flower-like	so/sp
20/09/12 06:06	EverybodyLovesNi	sp/so
20/07/18 19:16	Tman	sp/so
20/01/08 23:11	Tch	sp/so
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	so/sp
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	sp/so
19/12/26 02:16	Fuzzy	sp/so
19/09/27 23:01	Thyssen	sp/so
19/08/01 02:21	Ally	so/sp
19/07/03 03:03	LadyX	so/sp
19/11/25 15:02	Phantom	so/sp
19/03/29 18:12	fg	sp/so
19/03/29 06:03	Reddit	sp/so
19/01/23 19:19	Taco110	sp/so

date	username	vote
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	531
20/11/18 15:48	Flower-like	531
20/06/14 08:56	EverybodyLovesNi	531
20/05/02 08:11	kashifirfanbhatti	531
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	146
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	531
19/10/24 19:25	Thyssen	531
19/10/08 10:01	Diobono	531
19/09/29 12:30	kawaii	469
19/09/23 22:50	Teru Mikami	469
19/08/01 02:23	ally	513
19/07/29 18:00	tman	531
19/07/03 03:03	LadyX	153
19/06/21 23:10	ResoluteSoul	531
19/05/30 23:59	Taco110	513
19/03/30 06:40	Reddit	692
19/02/27 19:56	HairyBalls-	53x

date	username	vote
22/02/08 21:56	GIJOEBusta Cap	LII
21/03/14 08:44	Helvetica	LII
21/01/17 23:46	Jacobus	ILI
20/07/14 12:50	Flower-like	LII
20/05/24 19:38	fleetingpetals1	LII
20/05/02 08:11	kashifirfanbhatti	LII
19/12/29 15:53	poised	SLI
19/12/27 16:43	Tiger	SLI
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	LII
19/12/26 02:16	Fuzzy	LII
19/09/30 15:38	BasedGOD	LII
19/09/27 23:01	Thyssen	LII
19/09/22 20:45	ethan	IEE
19/08/01 02:23	ally	LII
19/07/29 18:01	tman	LII
19/05/29 01:06	Taco110	LII
19/03/29 18:11	fg	LII
19/05/26 18:43	Teru Mikami	SLE
19/04/01 13:39	Phantom	LII

date	username	vote
20/09/19 07:31	Flower-like	LVFE
24/02/12 01:34	fleetingpetals1	LFVE
20/01/23 18:44	Fuzzy	LVFE
19/12/26 22:30	joaoom	LVFE
19/11/25 15:02	Phantom	LVFE
19/10/16 14:20	fg	LVFE
19/10/16 12:02	Tman	LVFE
19/10/15 01:43	Thyssen	LVFE

date	username	vote
22/03/27 14:19	phsc	HEXACO
19/10/24 19:25	Thyssen	HEXACO

Flower-like INFP 4 2020/11/21 (Sat) 11:41:32 #8557
Easily Te over Ti. Religious use of logical fallacies and applying them, which is pointing out how other people's thinking is wrong according to other people's thinking.

Editing post #8557 by Flower-like Easily Te over Ti. Religious use of logical fallacies and applying them, which is pointing out how other people's thinking is wrong according to other people's thinking.
Replying to post #8557 by Flower-like

fleetingpetals1 INFP 6w5 sp/sx EII LEFV 2020/05/21 (Thu) 19:44:07 #8223
First impression. I can observe more later.

Editing post #8223 by fleetingpetals1 First impression. I can observe more later.
Replying to post #8223 by fleetingpetals1

	Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/12/26 (Thu) 03:50:51 #7557
	I'm not so sure anymore. I figurer your a J, becuse your just so sure of yourself, but confidince in ones asertons dose not a J make. I'm just going of the best I have, and have decided not to comit storngly one way or the other do to the lack of evidince.

Editing post #7557 by Tman <p>I'm not so sure anymore. I figurer your a J, becuse your just so sure of yourself, but confidince in ones asertons dose not a J make. I'm just going of the best I have, and have decided not to comit storngly one way or the other do to the lack of evidince. </p>
Replying to post #7557 by Tman

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/10/25 (Fri) 00:59:39 #7319
	you did not but everytime you used this word it was with a negative connotation and sometimeit was lacking of pertinence. for example in your comment on LadyX page about arbitrary rules of poetry.

Editing post #7319 by fg <p>you did not but everytime you used this word it was with a negative connotation and sometimeit was lacking of pertinence. for example in your comment on LadyX page about arbitrary rules of poetry.</p>
Replying to post #7319 by fg

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/10/25 (Fri) 00:44:22 #7316
	phsc, stop your bullshit with arbitrary, most rules are arbitrary, we don't deduce a norm from fact since David Hume so we have to make rule proposition at least partly arbitrary that we will impose

Editing post #7316 by fg <p>phsc, stop your bullshit with arbitrary, most rules are arbitrary, we don't deduce a norm from fact since David Hume so we have to make rule proposition at least partly arbitrary that we will impose</p>
Replying to post #7316 by fg

	Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE 2019/10/14 (Mon) 18:49:46 #7233
	I don't quite get how you think that, but this is your page. Elaborate on my page if and when you feel like it.

Editing post #7233 by Jacobus <p>I don't quite get how you think that, but this is your page. Elaborate on my page if and when you feel like it.</p>
Replying to post #7233 by Jacobus

	Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE 2019/10/14 (Mon) 18:17:32 #7231
	I know as much about it as Google Translate will let me know. I'm VELF, as if you were curious.

Editing post #7231 by Jacobus <p>I know as much about it as Google Translate will let me know.</p> <p>I'm VELF, as if you were curious.</p>
Replying to post #7231 by Jacobus

	BasedGOD ESTP 8w9 SLE 2019/09/30 (Mon) 15:51:13 #7182


Editing post #7182 by BasedGOD <p><a href="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/627696531419561995/628316714064674827/118541158-288-k916515.jpg" target="_top"><img alt="" src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/627696531419561995/628316714064674827/118541158-288-k916515.jpg" style="height:450px; width:288px" /></a></p>
Replying to post #7182 by BasedGOD

Teru Mikami 2019/09/28 (Sat) 23:12:41 #7170
BPD female

Editing post #7170 by Teru Mikami <p>BPD female</p>
Replying to post #7170 by Teru Mikami

Teru Mikami 2019/09/23 (Mon) 22:36:22 #7088
469

Editing post #7088 by Teru Mikami <p>469</p>
Replying to post #7088 by Teru Mikami

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/04 (Sun) 16:18:11 #6894
	I don't know if jt is male or female.

Editing post #6894 by tman <p>I don't know if jt is male or female.</p>
Replying to post #6894 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/04 (Sun) 16:14:28 #6892
	Oh god, they believe in the fucking law of attraction.

Editing post #6892 by tman <p>Oh god, they believe in the fucking law of attraction.</p>
Replying to post #6892 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 13:52:36 #6870
	Thought you were saying he was Ti dom, minor confustion.

Editing post #6870 by tman <p>Thought you were saying he was Ti dom, minor confustion.</p>
Replying to post #6870 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 17:46:39 #6868
	Teru isn't acatuly all that bad with Fe (he's pretty good at triggering people.) It's more he dosn't care about it.

Editing post #6868 by tman <p>Teru isn't acatuly all that bad with Fe (he's pretty good at triggering people.) It's more he dosn't care about it.</p>
Replying to post #6868 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 17:44:37 #6867
	I think that approach to rules comes from an internalized Ti framework, that recognizes the importance of rules, but that makes them want to make sense to us.

Editing post #6867 by tman <p>I think that approach to rules comes from an internalized Ti framework, that recognizes the importance of rules, but that makes them want to make sense to us.</p>
Replying to post #6867 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 17:44:10 #6866
	You're aporoch to athourty is very commen for Ti doms, it's not that we don't like rules, it's that we don't like stupid rules. Teru stricks me as more of an EXTP then IXTP. His Ti isn't really domaninte, and is more in copmation with Fe (sometimes he seems to just be trying to get a reacation.)

Editing post #6866 by tman <p>You're aporoch to athourty is very commen for Ti doms, it's not that we don't like rules, it's that we don't like stupid rules. Teru stricks me as more of an EXTP then IXTP. His Ti isn't really domaninte, and is more in copmation with Fe (sometimes he seems to just be trying to get a reacation.)</p>
Replying to post #6866 by tman

Teru Mikami 2019/08/02 (Fri) 12:25:49 #6864
I said you were LIE, dont think i ever had u as ILE, as for the rest believe me I tried reading it but this rubik's cube just needed solving I'll read it all one day trust me.

Editing post #6864 by Teru Mikami <p>I said you were LIE, dont think i ever had u as ILE, as for the rest believe me I tried reading it but this rubik's cube just needed solving I'll read it all one day trust me.</p>
Replying to post #6864 by Teru Mikami

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/08/02 (Fri) 16:02:00 #6863
	my sources tend to be idr labs, funky mbti fiction and the book adict of mbti (for most part).

Editing post #6863 by fg <p>my sources tend to be idr labs, funky mbti fiction and the book adict of mbti (for most part).</p>
Replying to post #6863 by fg

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/02 (Fri) 14:51:37 #6857
	fg, did you mean psch?

Editing post #6857 by tman <p>fg, did you mean psch?</p>
Replying to post #6857 by tman

Teru Mikami 2019/08/01 (Thu) 17:24:46 #6833


Editing post #6833 by Teru Mikami <p><iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" height="240" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/73wvmKT1Fbg" width="400"></iframe></p>
Replying to post #6833 by Teru Mikami

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/01 (Thu) 14:19:35 #6826
	Yeah, your not an EXTP type, but you sitll more likly to be that then INTJ.

Editing post #6826 by tman <p>Yeah, your not an EXTP type, but you sitll more likly to be that then INTJ.</p>
Replying to post #6826 by tman

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/01 (Thu) 14:18:41 #6825
	No, hacking fits my example of Ne blind, becuse it's still within a Ti framework.

Editing post #6825 by tman <p>No, hacking fits my example of Ne blind, becuse it's still within a Ti framework.</p>
Replying to post #6825 by tman

Teru Mikami 2019/08/01 (Thu) 06:31:40 #6824
"I'll do it later dude" "yeah sure. but later" "I don't have time. I'm playing Dota" ILI > LII tbh.

Editing post #6824 by Teru Mikami <p>"I'll do it later dude" "yeah sure. but later" "I don't have time. I'm playing Dota"</p> <p>ILI > LII tbh.</p>
Replying to post #6824 by Teru Mikami

	ally entp 3w4 ile 2019/08/01 (Thu) 02:54:03 #6808
	thats just best guess for ennea/iv because i dont talk to you but youre like a cute kind of weird spastic phsc i have faith that you wont actually die a virgin

Editing post #6808 by ally <p>thats just best guess for ennea/iv because i dont talk to you but youre like a cute kind of weird spastic phsc i have faith that you wont actually die a virgin </p>
Replying to post #6808 by ally

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/30 (Tue) 03:00:15 #6763
	Basicly, I'm sorry; I lashed out at you, even if you were wrong to insult me first, that doesn't give me the right to insult you.

Editing post #6763 by tman <p>Basicly, I'm sorry; I lashed out at you, even if you were wrong to insult me first, that doesn't give me the right to insult you.</p>
Replying to post #6763 by tman

	Taco110 Ni-Se you'll see ST 2019/07/29 (Mon) 21:45:46 #6755
	TACOMAN = tman. DUN DUN DUN. You got me lolololololololololol. Jk.

Editing post #6755 by Taco110 <p>TACOMAN = tman. DUN DUN DUN. You got me lolololololololololol. Jk.</p>
Replying to post #6755 by Taco110

Teru Mikami 2019/07/29 (Mon) 21:14:43 #6751
weed is for cumbrains

Editing post #6751 by Teru Mikami <p>weed is for cumbrains</p>
Replying to post #6751 by Teru Mikami

	kurapika isfp 4w3 SEI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 21:05:52 #6750
	anybody in this thread smoke weed

Editing post #6750 by kurapika <p>anybody in this thread smoke weed</p>
Replying to post #6750 by kurapika

Teru Mikami 2019/07/29 (Mon) 16:51:24 #6747
anyways stream epiphany!

Editing post #6747 by Teru Mikami <p>anyways stream epiphany!</p> <p><iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_61fptTRSD0"></iframe></p>
Replying to post #6747 by Teru Mikami

Teru Mikami 2019/07/29 (Mon) 20:16:59 #6743
my page is a work of art wym

Editing post #6743 by Teru Mikami <p>my page is a work of art wym</p>
Replying to post #6743 by Teru Mikami

Teru Mikami 2019/07/29 (Mon) 15:31:55 #6741
ignore phsc hes just a child

Editing post #6741 by Teru Mikami <p>ignore phsc hes just a child</p>
Replying to post #6741 by Teru Mikami

	tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/07/29 (Mon) 18:38:53 #6737
	I take it back, your most likly don't have Fe second, and honstly show some sings of Ne blind, so I'm gunna go with ISTP (IDR.) Strong Ti-Ni. I don't know how you would use Se (if at all) so that's gunna be a major blind spot, so feel free to enlighen me if your terable at it.

Editing post #6737 by tman <p>I take it back, your most likly don't have Fe second, and honstly show some sings of Ne blind, so I'm gunna go with ISTP (IDR.) Strong Ti-Ni. I don't know how you would use Se (if at all) so that's gunna be a major blind spot, so feel free to enlighen me if your terable at it.</p>
Replying to post #6737 by tman

Teru Mikami 2019/06/26 (Wed) 14:37:17 #6518
aiming to click the like button is my new favorite game

Editing post #6518 by Teru Mikami <p>aiming to click the like button is my new favorite game</p>
Replying to post #6518 by Teru Mikami

Diobono int 5w4 ili 2019/06/15 (Sat) 06:04:23 #6423
I don't believe in anonymous votes anymore, as in i don't see the point much so i just removed it and reput it i guess also in response to the very 'Ti loaded' debate going on with fg

Editing post #6423 by Diobono <p>I don't believe in anonymous votes anymore, as in i don't see the point much so i just removed it and reput it i guess also in response to the very 'Ti loaded' debate going on with fg</p>
Replying to post #6423 by Diobono

Teru Mikami 2019/06/11 (Tue) 17:55:38 #6398
5/96 isnt even an exact answer lmfaooo

Editing post #6398 by Teru Mikami <p>5/96 isnt even an exact answer lmfaooo</p>
Replying to post #6398 by Teru Mikami