Lowest HEXACO combo ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Lowest HEXACO combo

Most likely to

in Miscellaneous and General

Lowest HEXACO combo ~ Sakinorva Databank

Lowest HEXACO combo

Most likely to

Miscellaneous and General

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISTP 4

cp6w5 3

6w5 2

9w8 1

sp/sx 3

SLI 2

LSI 1

SLE 1

FLVE 3

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 34

7

4

6

3

4

4

3

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/05/28 (Thu) 17:10:25 #8246
	In response to post #8245. 9 is a very passive everything-is-always-OK type. Obviously 9s as people aren't going to always be like that, but type 9 as is talked about is the type does not get stressed over anything, lives by its worries, and takes the path of least resistance. 9 wing 8 may extend that further into passivity toward physical harm. Are 9w8s necessarily agreeable? Not really. They're meant to be apathetic, passive, and indifferent. You're right that 9 is an agreeable type, but the 8 wing gives the type enough room to fall on the lower side (or lowest side). This doesn't apply to (cp) 6 because E is basically written into the type. I wouldn't really know how to erase that aspect from the type altogether.

Editing post #8246 by strawberry crisis 9 is a very passive everything-is-always-OK type. Obviously 9s as people aren't going to always be like that, but type 9 as is talked about is the type does not get stressed over anything, lives by its worries, and takes the path of least resistance. 9 wing 8 may extend that further into passivity toward physical harm. Are 9w8s necessarily agreeable? Not really. They're meant to be apathetic, passive, and indifferent. You're right that 9 is an agreeable type, but the 8 wing gives the type enough room to fall on the lower side (or lowest side).<br><br>This doesn't apply to (cp) 6 because E is basically written into the type. I wouldn't really know how to erase that aspect from the type altogether.
Replying to post #8246 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/05/28 (Thu) 16:35:41 #8244
	In response to post #8243. The "grave error" in what you're doing here is that you attribute basically no fluidity to any of the types and implicitly create The Refined Archetype that is locked into specific points of preferences along different typology frameworks. 9 is a type that best fits lowest HEXACO. It's a type that is regarded as being lower on E, X, C and even O (though it has a larger range in this area), and can be indifferent with H. The point is that the range of what this type covers will go over somebody who would be lowest HEXACO too... just as would apply to ISTP, SLI, sp/sx, FLEV or whatever else. There's no precision to typology—just blobs that cover people.

Editing post #8244 by strawberry crisis The "grave error" in what you're doing here is that you attribute basically no fluidity to any of the types and implicitly create The Refined Archetype that is locked into specific points of preferences along different typology frameworks. 9 is a type that best fits lowest HEXACO. It's a type that is regarded as being lower on E, X, C and even O (though it has a larger range in this area), and can be indifferent with H. The point is that the range of what this type covers will go over somebody who would be lowest HEXACO too... just as would apply to ISTP, SLI, sp/sx, FLEV or whatever else. There's no precision to typology—just blobs that cover people.
Replying to post #8244 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/05/28 (Thu) 13:44:32 #8241
	In response to post #8237. The issue with archetype voting here is that you're not really starting with the base assumption of "lowest in everything HEXACO" but instead come up with some sort of fixed archetype that you envision would end up scoring lowest. I don't think the One True Type approach is necessary here... just imagine what somebody lowest in HEXACO would get in each system and work from there. It should be ISTP (highest preferences), 9w8, sp/sx, SLI, etc. And right, the 8 wing in 9w8 probably erases some of the agreeableness that a balanced 9 would have (though I don't recall if HEXACO does passive or active agreeability for its criteria)

Editing post #8241 by strawberry crisis The issue with archetype voting here is that you're not really starting with the base assumption of "lowest in everything HEXACO" but instead come up with some sort of fixed archetype that you envision would end up scoring lowest. I don't think the One True Type approach is necessary here... just imagine what somebody lowest in HEXACO would get in each system and work from there. It should be ISTP (highest preferences), 9w8, sp/sx, SLI, etc. And right, the 8 wing in 9w8 probably erases some of the agreeableness that a balanced 9 would have (though I don't recall if HEXACO does passive or active agreeability for its criteria)
Replying to post #8241 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
20/05/31 05:23	Diobono	ISTP
20/05/28 02:25	LadyX	ISTP
20/05/26 16:05	tch	ISTP
20/05/26 15:22	Vendrah	ISTP
20/05/19 18:29	fleetingpetals1	ISTP
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	ISTP
20/05/17 18:36	Tman	ISTP

date	username	vote
20/07/24 17:53	tch	ISTP
20/05/26 15:22	Vendrah	ISTP
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	ISTP
20/05/17 18:36	Tman	ISTP

date	username	vote
20/05/31 05:23	Diobono	6w5
20/05/28 02:51	strawberry crisis	9w8
20/05/28 02:25	LadyX	cp6w5
20/05/26 15:22	Vendrah	6w5
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	cp6w5
20/05/28 17:07	Tman	cp6w5

date	username	vote
20/05/28 02:25	LadyX	sp/sx
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	sp/sx
20/05/17 18:37	Tman	sp/sx

date	username	vote
20/07/24 17:53	tch	638
20/05/28 17:08	Tman	684
20/05/28 02:25	LadyX	684
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	684

date	username	vote
20/05/31 05:23	Diobono	LSI
20/05/28 17:09	Tman	SLI
20/05/19 18:29	fleetingpetals1	SLI
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	SLE

date	username	vote
20/05/31 05:21	Diobono	FLVE
20/05/28 17:10	Tman	FLVE
20/05/17 18:43	Thyssen	FLVE

date	username	vote
20/05/28 02:25	LadyX	HEXACO